XCOM 2 (PC) — February 5, 2016
The history of the X-COM series usually begins with the game UFO: Enemy Unknown in 1994. Although, it would probably be more accurate to look a little deeper. After all, Julian Gollop was the game designer and programmer of Rebelstar — the prototype of X-COM, which was released in the late 1980s on the ZX Spectrum 48K. There is an opinion that the series, reassembled under the wing of Firaxis Games, to which Julian no longer had any relation, is still significantly different from the canonical gameplay, and its true successor is Xenonauts. In some ways, this is true, but at its core lies the same turn-based tactics formula, born in Rebelstar. And XCOM: Enemy Unknown and its development in XCOM 2 by Firaxis Games is as logical and technological a step forward compared to the original UFO as UFO was compared to Rebelstar and Laser Squad.
What is the basis of the success formula? Management and tactics. Management at a global level: the player is responsible for building and developing the base, researching technologies, and developing the abilities of the soldiers. At the tactical level, the player gets the opportunity to realize the potential created at the global level, and if it is not enough, still decide the outcome of the battle in their favor due to tactical genius. Conversely, if you act head-on, all the manager's competent decisions will be wasted. More precisely, wasted on the Viper.
Yes, the turn-based tactics genre is not currently in favor with gamers. But when a truly high-quality project is released, it "suddenly" turns out that it can be popular and successful — like the recent Star Wars: Zero Company. So even after 10 years, XCOM 2 remains relevant.
Stardew Valley (PC) — February 26, 2016
According to Eric Barone, also known as ConcernedApe, it all started with learning the C++ programming language and a pet project to clone Harvest Moon. And in the end, it turned into worldwide fame and good money. Despite the fact that the game is now sold on Steam for a couple of hundred rubles, and at the time of release it was not much more expensive. But, as with Minecraft or Terraria, popular love did its job.
Why did this cozy farmer simulator become so popular? Yes, at its core are the same game mechanics: planting and harvesting crops, selling them, exploring a small world (few locations) and a mine — also a kind of genre classic, with simple combat. But behind this simplicity lies depth. Spring gives way to summer, and if you don't have the necessary products in stock, wait a whole year. Not enough money or resources to build a barn? Then you're not much of a manager or a farmer. Stardew Valley is not a mobile "tapper" that extorts real money for resources. Here you have to think.
And we also spend time in a small society: making acquaintances, building relationships. And, by the way, not necessarily with NPCs: you can play cooperatively with a real person.
What's good is that the graphics haven't aged at all. They were "old-fashioned" pixelated in 2016, and they remain so. And they still scare unprepared players. But if you abstract away from the visual simplicity, you can get lost in this valley for a long time. And after you master all the content in the game (and there's a lot of it) in a few hundred hours, you can entertain yourself with mods. Or look at quality successors — for example, Fields of Mistria.
Dark Souls III (PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One) — April 12, 2016
The third installment of the Dark Souls series evokes conflicting feelings in many players, and they are understandable. It's not as "groundbreaking" as the first or second games in the franchise. It's largely a competent compilation of ideas laid down in previous projects. And what seems insufficiently innovative to some gamers becomes a perfectly polished evolution of the genre to others.
If you are familiar with the first games in the series, no one will tell you anything fundamentally new about Dark Souls III. Miyazaki did everything the way he likes: dark fantasy, viscous and poisonous swamps, powerful enemies, intricate level design, and signature lore that needs to be collected bit by bit. Looking back from 2016 at the master's previous works — Dark Souls and Bloodborne — you really see: there are no radical changes in the third part. Perhaps the pace has become a little more dynamic, and the arsenal of techniques more diverse, which is a direct and logical nod to Bloodborne. But otherwise, it's the same recognizable cycle: death, learning, triumph, but presented with unprecedented cinematic scope. But the game boasts a flawlessly designed world, refined combat mechanics, and bosses. No, even BOSSES, giving that indescribable feeling of triumph after each defeated giant. Mikhail Shkredov was very pleased with the game in 2016.
The Souls-like genre currently maintains frantic popularity, and every few months we get another release of varying degrees of success. But now it also has its absolute peak — Elden Ring from the same Miyazaki, and gamers are eagerly awaiting the PvPvE action game The Duskbloods, which, whatever it turns out to be, is already generating huge interest. So is it worth returning to Dark Souls III now? Absolutely yes. It's not yet a museum exhibit, but it's still one of the most refined projects in the genre.
DOOM (PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One) — May 13, 2016
By 2016, the DOOM franchise hadn't exactly lost its recognition. No. The shock (in a good way) from the first two games was very strong. But already with DOOM 3, id Software turned more towards horror, trying to imitate Half-Life in terms of plot. And originally, DOOM was about something else. We analyzed the DNA of this series in a separate article. But in short, DOOM was loved for its minimalism in narrative, technological breakthrough, core mechanics, and freedom of expression leading to catharsis.
And in 2016, id Software managed to put it all together into a thrilling bloody shooter that remains the best in the series among those in 3D. DOOM II is in any case beyond competition, because it's foolish to compete with a classic. What made it the best? Preserving the series' DNA. First: balance in narrative. There was a plot, but it could easily be skipped. You lost nothing. The engine delivered a stable frame rate, and the picture was pleasing to the eye. The gameplay mechanics and weapon set did not copy the popular online shooters of those years, but returned the traditional arsenal. And thanks to this, level by level, clearing locations of monsters, we also clear our minds. Catharsis comes.
Is it worth playing now? Absolutely, if you somehow missed it.
Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End (PlayStation 4) — May 10, 2016
Comparing modern exclusive projects on PlayStation 5 with games of the previous generation, one involuntarily catches oneself thinking that Sony's internal studios have begun to pay more attention to self-reflection and self-expression instead of working for the audience. And Uncharted 4 is precisely a work for the audience. A cinematic adventure action game in the spirit of Indiana Jones and Tomb Raider. The pinnacle of the series.
And the phrase about the pinnacle of the series is not for the sake of a pretty word. For example, in his 2016 review, Vitaly Kazunov finds only one drawback in the game: "After Uncharted 4, it's difficult to adequately perceive other games." And one could say that times have changed and better adventure games have appeared in ten years. But it doesn't work out. Neither Sony nor other publishers have been able to offer such a bright adventure action game. No games in this genre have been released where the plot, characters, and staging were so well developed. And all this was accompanied by excellent acting, not spoiled by localization. But the game's success is not only due to its cinematic staging. The game also features dynamic battles and flexible combat mechanics.
At the time of release, the game was "hostage" to its exclusivity on PlayStation 4. But it was lucky: during the relatively short period when Sony began releasing its hits on PC, it also reached it in 2022. Alas, the company doesn't quite understand how to work with the PC market, and an excellent game went largely unnoticed among PC gamers. But the 10th anniversary is an excellent reason to remember it, finally play it, and get a lot of pleasure.
Overwatch (PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One) — May 24, 2016
Overwatch 2016 no longer exists and the project is closed? Formally, yes. Then consider this text in the game archive in memoriam, that is, dedicated to that very Overwatch.
In reality, there's nothing sad about this fact. In reality, Overwatch is very much alive, even if it has the number "2" in its name. Blizzard of 2022 simply didn't understand what to do with this franchise: first they broke everything, and then they started bringing back elements "as they were" from the first part and developing the game along the same path as at the initial stage.
In team-based first-person shooters, victory depends not so much on individual skill (although that is also important) as on coordinated teamwork. Unique heroes with their own abilities and "ults," role division — tank, damage, support — and clear objectives on maps provide that fun. It's a kind of addiction that makes you launch the game again and again. Replayability is insane. And Overwatch is also loved for its charismatic heroes. The not-so-long "woke era" slightly spoiled the impressions, but it seems times are changing.
But how relevant is Overwatch now? Although online hero shooters are no longer hyped, they still have a dedicated community. The live servers of Team Fortress 2 and similar genre veterans confirm this. Overwatch 2 is also on this list. Unfortunately, due to Activision Blizzard's policy, which suspended official support and game sales in Russia since 2022, domestic players have faced difficulties: direct donations are disabled, and topping up the balance requires "dancing with a tambourine" in the form of changing the account region, buying gift cards, or using intermediaries. And with servers and ping, not everything is as smooth as one would like.
No Man’s Sky (PC, PlayStation 4) — August 9, 2016
Let's make a reservation right away: reading Vitaly Kazunov's review of this game from 2016 is meaningless now. It's the cry of a disappointed person who was deceived. It's equally meaningless to study any other reviews of the release version. If the reviewer was honest with the reader, there will definitely be the same stream of indignation due to dashed expectations. The developers from Hello Games took a powerful blow to their reputation. The world of the gaming industry is cruel and does not forgive empty promises. But what matters is not the blow you receive from players, but how you take it and how you move forward. And the developers decided not just to "wipe their tears and move on," but to answer for their words and give people the game they promised.
A year later, the Atlas Rises update not only added the long-awaited multiplayer and storyline but also brought the game back to the top of the Steam charts. And now No Man's Sky is one of the best examples of honest error correction in the history of the industry. What was promised in the 2016 trailers was not just implemented but vastly surpassed. Now it's a huge sci-fi sandbox about open space travel. Seamless flights from planet to orbit, exploration and interaction with various forms of extraterrestrial life, resource extraction, and battles. Starting a journey on the outskirts of the galaxy, where the hero, according to the plot, crashes his ship, the player embarks on a path that step by step reveals the universe of this game. Literally: information about all star systems and planets is updated jointly with other players. And here you can also build bases, manage a fleet, and do much more.
If in 2016 our authors were asked if they would recommend No Man's Sky to readers, the answer would be a categorical: "No." But now it's 2026. And we say: pay attention to No Man's Sky. The game still (!) receives massive free updates, having transformed from the biggest disappointment of the decade into its most inspiring and triumphant comeback.
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided (PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One) — August 23, 2016
Deus Ex is one of the most significant game franchises. And it's not about "mercantile" metrics — the combined sales of Human Revolution and Mankind Divided eventually exceeded 12 million copies — it's important as a bold philosophical statement, wrapped in the shell of an immersive sim with stealth elements. It's a deep reflection on the boundaries of transhumanism and the price of progress in the cyberpunk era.
In terms of gameplay, Mankind Divided brings the series' main feature to its absolute peak: variability. There is no "one true path" here. Ventilation shafts, camera hacking, teleportation dash, or a direct assault with a shield and time slowdown — the choice is yours. The game honestly reacts to augmentations: no improved lungs? You'll have to find a workaround, because you can't get through a poisoned corridor. But eloquence sometimes allows you to persuade a boss to surrender or avoid a massacre by simply choosing the right dialogue option. Yes, the AI of enemies in open combat sometimes fails, but this is not an esports shooter.
If you haven't played Deus Ex: Human Revolution and Mankind Divided, we have two pieces of news for you. As usual, good and bad. The good news is that you have the opportunity to play these masterpieces for the first time. The bad news is that Mankind Divided ends "at the most interesting point," and a sequel never followed. Ten years after its release, you risk joining the ranks of fans futilely waiting for closure: it seems like a hopeless love. Mikhail Shkredov wrote in his 2016 review: "Such a captivating story does not deserve an ellipsis at the end." But he also added: "There is no regret for the time spent." So play it if you haven't already.
Titanfall 2 (PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One) — October 28, 2016
A surprising coincidence: 2016 was the year when two single-player focused shooters were released that remain exemplary for the genre. But if DOOM needs no introduction, the situation with Titanfall 2 is different. Alas, the game needs such recollections and compilations. In our opinion, more gamers should know about it.
The shooter mechanics themselves in the Titanfall series, if one can put it that way, are standard for the genre. Or, perhaps, even a little conservative, due to the Source engine, although it feels better than many competitors. But, like the Half-Life series, here the plot is a full-fledged part of the gameplay, and together they create an incredible adventure. There are also unusual findings, such as playing with time: a special device allows the hero to instantly move to the past and return. At the same time, not only the scenery changes, but also the arrangement of enemies, situations on the level, and opportunities for interaction with the environment. And, of course, the ability to control a huge humanoid robot — a titan — is captivating. In these moments, the shooter turns into a real mech simulator.
I will only add that after 10 years, the game and its ideas have not aged at all — it is definitely worth playing. Rarely does a modern AAA publisher dare to release an expensive, beautiful story-driven first-person shooter with an emphasis on single-player, preferring to cash in on another "battle royale." id Software took a risk with DOOM: The Dark Ages, but, to put it mildly, it didn't turn out very well. So we probably won't see Titanfall 3. Or did Valve's curse transfer through the Source engine?
Dishonored 2 (PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One) — November 11, 2016
"To call Dishonored 2 merely a good sequel is to insult this game" — this opinion was expressed by Mikhail Shkredov in his 2016 review. And although within the game archive we usually give recommendations at the end, here we will do it immediately: it is definitely worth playing. But first, play the first part, and only then tackle the sequel. You will be pleasantly surprised twice.
The first time — by how beautiful the original Dishonored is: with interesting mechanics, plot, and stunning aesthetics. And the second time — by how much better and grander the second part became. And its main feature is two different playthrough paths, as you are offered a choice of two protagonists.
The key difference between the aging protector Corvo and the grown-up Empress Emily lies in their paranormal abilities. If Corvo relies on classic teleportation and prefers close-quarters and often open combat, Emily uses a magical equivalent of a grappling hook, allowing her not only to move but also to pull enemies for instant, stealthy takedowns. Both heroes are skilled with a sword, crossbow, and mines. The levels here have turned into gigantic multi-layered anthills. There are infinitely many detours, and exploring hidden corners is always rewarded with scarce runes and artifacts. The game does not forgive overconfidence but rewards searching for new tactics: from bloodless games of hide-and-seek to using mystical powers at the right moment.
And returning to recommendations. Yes, it is unequivocally worth playing. The genre of stealth sandboxes, with such maniacal attention to detail, variability, and respect for the player's intellect, is not going through its best times these days. Therefore, skipping this gem is simply sacrilegious.